ISO 14001:2015 - Introduction to the expected changes

The revision process for the standards is common, and ISO 14001:2015 is undergoing similar scrutiny. The draft revisions will continue as per the process that ISO follows. The working group is expected to move toward a true consensus standard following up on comments and suggestions. This is expected to be finalized by end of 2015. The standard is then expected to be good till about 2025. These fundamental changes are going to be with us for a long time. So by September of 2015, both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 will be available in the revised format.

  The ISO 14001:2004 lays the framework for organizations to manage environmental aspects effectively and ensure protection of the environment and prevent pollution. This internationally accepted standard is proof of an organization conforming to the EMS (environmental management system) principles. The existing standard has stood the test of time, but the changes envisaged now will ensure the revised standard continues to meet emerging and future requirements and expectations of stakeholders. This is a fundamental revision to the standard similar to what is being done for ISO 9001 and what has already been implemented in ISO 27001. This is expected to be followed perhaps to publish a new standard encompassing the current OHSAS and ANSI standards with a single occupational health and safety standard under the ISO framework with the HLS (High Level Structure). The revisions will impact both the structure of the standard and the contents. 

   

   Expected Changes. The revised standard not only will have many clauses further strengthened but the order of many in the standard will change to the new structure to align with the HLS prescribed in  Annex SL. Awareness, for example, will no longer be part of competence and training; instead it will be in a separate sub-clause. The standard will provide greater emphasis on improvement. Changes to the structure will address new requirements requiring the understanding of the organization and its context as also the needs and expectations of interested parties. New clauses will address external communication and reporting, value chain planning and control and continual improvement. 

   Annex SL. The revised standard will have structural changes aligned with the HLS provided in  ISO Guide 83/ Annex SL. The look and feel of ISO 14001:2015 is expected to be functional for the management system approach aligned to the approach in ISO 9001:2015 as applicable to quality, to ISO 27001 – information security and ISO 50001 – for energy. The integrated management system approach which has been tried all these years was a challenge similar to the side car attached to a motorcycle! With the guidelines of ISO Guide 83/ Annex SL better integration of organizations management strategies.

   Leadership. The emphasis on leadership will ensure environmental management is integral to overall management strategy, policy and business development. Considering the environmental requirements as integral to the business development and continuity will require an overall consideration. The leadership will be required to further consider: 

1. Evaluation and understanding of both external and internal context of the organization in relationship to the environment. Implying that not only must organizations consider the impact of activities on the environment (as with ISO 14001:2004) but also consider the impact of the environment on the organization’s activities. 
2. Organizations will need to consider the needs and impacts of interested parties, including their supply chains and end users. 
3. Enhanced leadership commitment to include expanding the pollution prevention commitment to cover sustainable resource use, climate change mitigation and adaptation and protection of the environment biodiversity and restoration of the natural habitat. 
4. There is expected emphasis on transparency in line with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Social Responsibility aspects from ISO 26000 requiring reporting of environmental performance. 
5. Evaluating organizational risks and opportunities in the context of external environmental conditions as adapting to climate change and so on. 

In conclusion, please stay tuned for future articles on this subject. It is important for management to know what to expect from future audits and for auditors to understand that when ISO 14001:2015 is published, it will have a new structure and text aligned to the HLS as per ISO Guide 83/ Annex SL. It will address the recommendations from ISO “Future Challenges” study for the adoption of various approaches in the field of EMS. The revision to the standard is a fundamental change.

Training: A Luxury or Strategic Necessity?

Well-developed management systems are developed and implemented to drive efficiency in organizations.  These systems when implemented ensure that  the organization does not become vulnerable or lose its integrity when key personnel change as also during any mergers and splits in organizations. Just as technology is constantly upgraded, so must human potential. In any organization, large or small, training which needs the least investment can play a very important role given the critical contribution by human resources in ensuring efficiency. The necessity of training in building human potential and productivity to ensure optimization of human resources can hardly be emphasized.  

Top Management often go in for implementation of management systems without answering the employee’s question of “what is in it for me?” Training and exposing 10 to 15% of the manpower to management system related standards for efficiency (ISO 9001), risk management (ISO 33000), the environment management (ISO 14001) and security of the global supply chain (ISO 28000) quite prepares them for the system implementation. Some  organizations might choose to implement an integrated management system encompassing all or a combination of two or more of the above standards.

Organizations view training as a luxury and often not as a strategic necessity. A well trained manpower is a great asset in getting the “job done” . When budgets are cut training is often given a low priority. In difficult financial situations when all else costs the organizations so much more, a little investment in well trained manpower results in rich dividends and ensures human capital continues operating at their peak efficiency as a motivated work force even through bleak periods thus ensuring a continually efficient system. As a system is developed and put into place a trained workforce helps to better implement the system and results in a ‘buy in’ of the entire team. A team that appreciates the important role that a well implemented system plays in increasing the efficiency of a system while reducing non-conformities (NC).

As NCs are embraced to drive continual improvement the number of problems affecting the system reduce and the work force has its answer to "what is in it for me". This gives the organization strength in depth and provides more time to innovate and thus continually strive for new heights of excellence.

The benefits of training are intangible but below are listed a few: 

• Better output

• Higher Retention 

• Team Spirit 

• Improved corporate Image 

• Higher morale 

• Improved Profitability 

• Fewer Accidents

A small investment in training will ensure an oriented manpower, familiarized and ready to implement and meet the management’s system objectives and align them with the organizations aim of doing much more with much less.

Why should SME (Small and Medium Enterprises) implement ISO 14001?

Our senior consultant Tom Venafro has been working on EMS (Environmental Management Systems ) all his life. I was having a discussion with him and asked him, “Why should SME (Small and Medium Enterprises) implement ISO 14001?” In fact more, why are they reluctant to meet this responsibility. Are these companies even aware that just being efficient (using a system based on ISO 9001:2008) may ensure efficiency, however unless the byproducts and pollutants which are the result of a process are controlled the organizations will eventually see a declining “cash in the bank”. Going further, and learning from 9/11 we know that an efficient system should not only take care of the environment to be profitable and viable but must be secure. The implementation of  a system to protect the global supply chain based on ISO 28000 needs to be considered as an asset. Social responsibility is integral to good business today. On ISO 14001 Tom had the following views:

Small and medium business should be considering ISO 14001 EMS for their sustainability in more ways than one. Of course having a certified EMS will provide both a green "sustainable" future as well as a green "monetary" bottom line.

Aside from and implemented EMS being the right thing to do for the environment, it also reaps financial benefits.  Recycling programs means less waste to landfill, less regular waste pick-ups more money saved. The EMS will provide the framework for a company to be a good steward of the environment and help reduce its impact on the environment. This equates to more control over pollution sources and less fines from regulators and huge "cradle to grave" liability.

These items are just the tip of the iceberg. Beneath the water line the hidden benefits begin to pile up. Employee moral improves, process organization and efficiency increases. Employee awareness from a EMS seeps into employee's home lives furthering green living.  These combined activities begin to make an larger positive impact on society. This eventually trickles down to economics, meaning that the positive cumulative effect of pollution prevention contributes to keeping costs to taxpayers low.

An EMS is the guide organizations should use to trigger constructive environmental thought. For example, 14001 clause 4.4.7 Emergency Preparedness and Response is meant for an organization to consider the environmental impact that can be caused from an emergency or natural disaster. This is not a normal consideration that would not usually be made.

The standard requires that employees understand the aspects and targets the organization is trying to obtain. Most importantly, they require that employees and contractors understand the consequences of their departure from specified procedures or operational controls.

Of course the EMS has the same customer benefits in the marketplace as ISO 9001QMS does.  Customers will ask and require a certified EMS more going forward. Having an EMS is a case of "sustainability".