Training: A Luxury or Strategic Necessity?

Well-developed management systems are developed and implemented to drive efficiency in organizations.  These systems when implemented ensure that  the organization does not become vulnerable or lose its integrity when key personnel change as also during any mergers and splits in organizations. Just as technology is constantly upgraded, so must human potential. In any organization, large or small, training which needs the least investment can play a very important role given the critical contribution by human resources in ensuring efficiency. The necessity of training in building human potential and productivity to ensure optimization of human resources can hardly be emphasized.  

Top Management often go in for implementation of management systems without answering the employee’s question of “what is in it for me?” Training and exposing 10 to 15% of the manpower to management system related standards for efficiency (ISO 9001), risk management (ISO 33000), the environment management (ISO 14001) and security of the global supply chain (ISO 28000) quite prepares them for the system implementation. Some  organizations might choose to implement an integrated management system encompassing all or a combination of two or more of the above standards.

Organizations view training as a luxury and often not as a strategic necessity. A well trained manpower is a great asset in getting the “job done” . When budgets are cut training is often given a low priority. In difficult financial situations when all else costs the organizations so much more, a little investment in well trained manpower results in rich dividends and ensures human capital continues operating at their peak efficiency as a motivated work force even through bleak periods thus ensuring a continually efficient system. As a system is developed and put into place a trained workforce helps to better implement the system and results in a ‘buy in’ of the entire team. A team that appreciates the important role that a well implemented system plays in increasing the efficiency of a system while reducing non-conformities (NC).

As NCs are embraced to drive continual improvement the number of problems affecting the system reduce and the work force has its answer to "what is in it for me". This gives the organization strength in depth and provides more time to innovate and thus continually strive for new heights of excellence.

The benefits of training are intangible but below are listed a few: 

• Better output

• Higher Retention 

• Team Spirit 

• Improved corporate Image 

• Higher morale 

• Improved Profitability 

• Fewer Accidents

A small investment in training will ensure an oriented manpower, familiarized and ready to implement and meet the management’s system objectives and align them with the organizations aim of doing much more with much less.

ISO 9001 Certification versus ISO 9001 Conformity

All organizations can benefit from making sure their organizational management system conforms to ISO 9001.

Certification provides marketing benefits to organizations whose customers value the independent certificate and the registrar that issues it.  Certain new customers may provide a new supplier with a certified management system with an opportunity to prove they can fulfill their requirements.  Certification reduces the risk for a new customer trying out new suppliers.

Existing customers often are not impressed with certification because they already know how well your organization, as a system, performs.

For organizations that work in markets with customers who have no interest in certification it is better to quietly make sure your management system conforms to the standard.  This provides confidence that requirements will be fulfilled and are being fulfilled.  It also enables continual improvement of products, processes and the management system to prosper and grow.

Certification has initial cost and then recurring cost when the registrar comes in at least every 6 months. The benefit of conformance is the system is always ready and when marketing demands require you can go ahead with certification.

To learn more about the benefits you can email me at info@qmii.com

Does implementing a Process Based Management System put my job at risk?

Recently while working with some students in a Lead Auditor class for ISO 9001 one of the students came up with a serious concern about his being committed to ISO 9001! His questions was “With a  well-documented Process Based Management System (PBMS) in place everyone will know what I do. So how can I then ensure the security of my job?”  Over numerous classes that I have taught, this question often comes in one form or the other. This is particularly relevant when I work in other countries where jobs are hard to come by. I am sure there are others who have this job insecurity as their  company begins the process of implementing a PBMS based on a standard. Their worry is “what is in it for me?”

Clause 5.5.3 of the ISO 9001:2008 requires the management to ensure internal communications with regard to the effectiveness of the quality management system. These internal communications must explain and address the doubts of the employees. The employees must appreciate that a bad system can let down the best man every time. Without a system the blame culture will prevail and overall efficiency be adversely affected. Management will then invariably ask “Who?” – meaning blame the employee, instead of asking “How?” and or “Why”- meaning how and why did the system let down the employee. In real terms with the system the blame moves from the individual to the system. Even if the employee’s incompetence caused the deficiency the system failed in terms of ensuring competence either by incorrect hiring, or training or continued education and so on. The organization should improve the system which placed an incompetent employee in a position where he/she could not perform, instead of blaming the employee. Disheartened employees are the result of being always blamed for poor work and the results, leading to the work environment (clause 6.4) not being congenial for achieving product conformity. How can any organization achieve continual improvement (clause 8.5.1) if deficiencies are not addressed.

Employees often forget that their job security is dependent on the organization constantly improving with the continual improvement cycle to be productive and viable. Without the improvements the organization itself will go out of business and so the jobs will be lost. Investing in a system approach and addressing deficiencies by corrective action(clause 8.5.2) can against the recurrence of non-conformities. As the data base builds and the employees can get the information from the data and analyze it (clause 8.4) can they predict potential NCs (clause 8.5.3) and so add value and therefore sustain the organization to enable the organization to continue to meet the expectations of the manpower. After all benefits are an outcome of the “cash in the bank”.

As the PARs (Preventive Action Requests) start coming in and the employee participation increases the system stabilizes creating the environment for innovation. The organization immensely benefits from innovative products (story of Apple is a case in point) and is therefore able to pay its employees better. A system approach therefore not only is an investment in retaining the employees (job security) but a sure way to ensure better future prospects. The success of the organization then contributes to the well-being of the society and the ultimate prosperity of the nation. We could stretch the benefit of the system approach further and say it would meet the futuristic stability too and ensure conduct which is socially responsible (SR).